Subject:
|
Re: USC Star Destroyer scale fighters, MF, and Shuttle!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Mon, 30 Sep 2002 13:21:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
627 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Mike Petrucelli writes:
> >
> > Maybe this A-wing would be closer to scale:
> >
> > http://www.bricklink.com/P/1/752.gif
>
>
> Uh... isn't that piece larger than the 'X-Wing' piece I used? As to why I
> made them same size... well that is why I put the 'X-Wing' on a 45 degree
> angle to make it longer. None of the other parts really fit and they are
> close enough when using this scale. It was more for fun than accuraccy
> anyway. :-)
This is serious business.(1)
Have a look at this:
http://news.lugnet.com/market/shipping/?n=542
"Hose Flexible End 1 x 1 x 2/3 without Tabs" has a weight of 0.103g
"Plate 1 x 1" has a weight of 0.176g
The dimensions of a 1x1 plate are appx 8mm x 8mm x 5mm
If you turn it diagonally, the length and width are 11.3mm
The dimensions of a hose end are appx 6.3mm in diameter, and 6.4mm long
(these measurements come from http://www.lugnet.com/~330/FAQ/Build/dimensions)
So, although a hose end on it's side will slightly taller than a 1x1 plate,
it will still be shorter and narrower. And it's shape is more A-wing-like.
QED.
Jeff J
(1) No, it isn't! ;)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: USC Star Destroyer scale fighters, MF, and Shuttle!
|
| (...) Uh... isn't that piece larger than the 'X-Wing' piece I used? As to why I made them same size... well that is why I put the 'X-Wing' on a 45 degree angle to make it longer. None of the other parts really fit and they are close enough when (...) (22 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
