To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / 12341
12340  |  12342
Subject: 
Re: Too Many StubbiesT? (Was: New Slave 1 on StarWars.com)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.starwars
Date: 
Thu, 31 Jan 2002 21:55:57 GMT
Viewed: 
481 times
  
"Matthew Gerber" <matthew@digitaliris.com> wrote in message
news:GqtE80.Coq@lugnet.com...
In lugnet.starwars, Steve Tanner writes:
Has everyone seen the new Slave 1 on the Official Site?
http://www.starwars.com/collecting/news/2002/01/news20020131.html

How do you think it compares to 7144?  Personally, I like the colors, but
those windows seem a bit to simplified for my tastes.  The original • version
I felt did a better job here in being "pure LEGO"

I agree...the window is too Jack Stone.

More importantly though, to my mind, is the inclusion of young Boba Fett • in
the set...look  at the picture...this seems to be the first case of LEGO
using StubbiesT to do a figure as a child scaled to an adult. When we • first
caught wind of the shorter legs, this is, of course, something we all
thought of, but now LEGO is doing it for real...do we like this or not?

Why I ask: Scale has always been tenuous at best when talking about LEGO,
especially where our adoreable, but horribly deformed and out-of-scale,
favorite figures are concerned. I don't have anything against StubbiesT
except that they are esentially POOPs, and as such have decilned play • value.

But what does this new scale mean? I don't want like, say, the entire • Harry
Potter line to switch to StubbiesT because of all the kids, because then • the
play value and the reuseability of the fig parts declines to a sorry • point.
Likewise, I DO NOT want to be innundated by StubbiesT ever...I need true,
articulated, minifig legs, thankyouverymuch, and scale be damned! No one • was
worried when 10 year old Anakin was the same height as 25 year old • Obi-Wan.
I don't mind StubbiesT being used for certain things (Yoda, Ewoks,
Gringott's goblins) for fun and effect, but I see this as far different • from
producing tons of the things.

Am I nuts? Does anyone agree with me? Are StubbiesT the end of the
articulated minifig legs forever?

I hope Boba's Stubby legs are blue.  I'll use them for my Watto and give
Boba his legs.

--
Grant Giandonato
g.giandonato@home.com



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Too Many StubbiesT? (Was: New Slave 1 on StarWars.com)
 
(...) Actually, they seem to be light blue...so perfect for Watto! Good call... Matt (23 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.starwars)

Message is in Reply To:
  Too Many Stubbies™? (Was: New Slave 1 on StarWars.com)
 
(...) I agree...the window is too Jack Stone. More importantly though, to my mind, is the inclusion of young Boba Fett in the set...look at the picture...this seems to be the first case of LEGO using Stubbies™ to do a figure as a child scaled to an (...) (23 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.general)

8 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR