Subject:
|
Re: --==Stubbies==--
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Fri, 9 Nov 2001 05:19:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1156 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Matthew Gerber writes:
> In lugnet.starwars, Richard Noeckel writes:
> > Image Courtesy of Geoffrey Hawley:
> > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=82016
> >
> > Geoffrey wrote:
> > > FINALLY... I... see... EWOK LEGS!! But for the life of me I can't figure
> > > out what I'm seeing. They look to be as tall as a brick, but it looks like
> > > each individual leg disappears Into the body without joining to a
> > > hinge/pelvis first. The chest (which as we know is part of the head)
> > > extends below where the body ends, so my only real view of the intersection
> > > between the legs and the body is the side.
> >
> > A few points I was unclear upon…
> >
> > Are the legs static & motionless or do they move in a manner similar
> > to the original minifig legs?
>
> Ut-oh...now that I'm looking closely, could it be that *GASP* there ARE NO
> STUBBIES?
It looks like a special (hingeless) 1x2 brick to me -- we shall see...
> > And if possible, could you post clearer photos of the Ewok without his
> > head/hood piece?
>
> Oughtta' just be a minifig head...possibly the blank brown head from the Tie
> Pilot.
Yep, perfect for your "faceless Lando" custom fig. OTOH I think it could be
a Chewie/Watto style head and vest piece.
--DaveL
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: --==Stubbies==--
|
| (...) Ut-oh...now that I'm looking closely, could it be that *GASP* there ARE NO STUBBIES? (...) Get this...could this be, instead of shorter legs like we supposed, that there is a new torso than covers regular legs? And what phrase will we fight to (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
