Subject:
|
Re: --==Stubbies==--
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Fri, 9 Nov 2001 07:05:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
422 times
|
| |
| |
> > Image Courtesy of Geoffrey Hawley:
> > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=82016
In lugnet.starwars, Matthew Gerber writes:
> Uh-oh...now that I'm looking closely, could it be that *GASP* there
> ARE NO STUBBIES?
---
Well, there goes our plans for world domination
Maybe next time!
<Initiate Beta sequence/ Back-up plan 431.>
---
Actually, I'd still bet that the Ewoks have stubbies.
(So dont through out your Trade Mark claimant rights just yet.)
Dave Low wrote:
> I think it could be a Chewie/Watto style head and vest piece.
Thats what I meant! :)
If the vest piece could be removed then we could better discern
the nature of the new element. And see just how they connect.
(if they even do
the stubbie legs & torso could be fused as one)
till then,
--==Richard==--
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: --==Stubbies==--
|
| (...) <Double roger...the weasel is in the chicken coop...I repeat, the weasel is in the chicken coop/Launch all cows on my mark> Matt (23 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: --==Stubbies==--
|
| (...) Ut-oh...now that I'm looking closely, could it be that *GASP* there ARE NO STUBBIES? (...) Get this...could this be, instead of shorter legs like we supposed, that there is a new torso than covers regular legs? And what phrase will we fight to (...) (23 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|