 | | Re: Episode II named —James Simpson
| | | | (...) Yes, but one can still hope that George will recover the artistic vision of ANH and TESB. I won't pilgrimage to the theaters with the same zealous optimism as I had when Ep 1 was released, but I still look forward to Ep. 2's release. If (...) (23 years ago, 29-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Episode II named —Jaco van der Molen
| | | | | People! If you want to discuss about the title please go to (URL) continue there. IMHO the main topic here should be "Star Wars LEGO" and not "Star Wars". Furthermore I have done some research on how and why George Lucas named this film AOTC and I (...) (23 years ago, 30-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Episode II named —Scott Sanburn
| | | | | Jaco & All, (...) Well, this is what the website states as the criteria for this group: "LEGO®/Star Wars®: products (information, opinions, reviews, licensing issues, etc.); building (settings, contexts, characters, projects, models, layouts, plans, (...) (23 years ago, 30-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Episode II named —Markham Carroll
| | | | | Scott E. Sanburn <ssanburn@indalex.com> wrote in message news:GIvoC2.Jzr@lugnet.com... (...) like (...) LOL, what would be the point of a SW LEGO group if we can't discuss SW? : 'p -- Booga Who needs sanity when you have iNsAniTy?! All your Lego (...) (23 years ago, 31-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | |
