To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / 11195
11194  |  11196
Subject: 
Re: Ultra-quick modification.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.starwars
Date: 
Mon, 2 Apr 2001 15:44:25 GMT
Viewed: 
446 times
  
"Jesse and Valarie Long" <jesseandval@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:GB5xBK.BEo@lugnet.com...
Remember, you need three X- and Y- if you're going to make the trench
scenes.  There's your excuse if you need one for your NLSO.  Are we still
using that acronym?

I was thinking of just having Red 5 being chased and a couple of additional
ships floating around, with the Falcon coming out of the light bulb -
nearest thing to the Sun in my room!

NLSO? What's that?

If I ever get around to it I'm going to turn my other DV's TIE into a TIE
bomber.  But I don't know if I can bring myself to mar the sacred beauty • of
The Set As It Is.

It's a great set, isn't it? I pull it apart every now and again to try to
find a better construction for my Interceptor wings (current version uses a
couple of parts I only have on the TIE Advanced in black/grey) and quickly
put it back on the shelf between the 2 TIEs.

Maybe I should try building a TIE fiighter from the UCS Interceptor and
extra parts ... no, that would mean having to then buy 2 more UCS TIEs and
extra parts so I could have 2 TIE fighters and an Advanced and re-enact the
Death Star run at UCS scale ;)

Dan



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Ultra-quick modification.
 
Daniel Crichton <danielc@helio.co.uk> wrote in message news:GB691G.Buw@lugnet.com... (...) still (...) additional (...) Non-Lego (fan) Significant Other. Usually an unappreciative wife or girlfriend. One who doesn't understand why you spend so much (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.starwars)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Ultra-quick modification.
 
Daniel Crichton <danielc@helio.co.uk> wrote in message news:GB05o5.Exu@lugnet.com... (...) No, but an interesting idea. I bet with a little additional modification you could get a half-decent TIE interceptor without too many extra pieces. Unless (...) (23 years ago, 2-Apr-01, to lugnet.starwars)

7 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR