 | | Re: Why can't we have a Lando: Lego's Race policy
|
|
(...) Yes, this is another way in which it'd be a win for Lego. :) (24 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Why can't we have a Lando: Lego's Race policy
|
|
(...) ...That would be a nightmare, since then I'd have to buy dozens of each set to make sure I got all the combinations of minifig head colours/patterns! :-) ...you can go back to ignoring me now... wubwub stephen f roberts wamalug guy ((URL) #160 (24 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Mark's Lego Creations Update!
|
|
You know, sometimes I could just kick myself. :^P (...) Spacecraft (...) all (...) (24 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | This Past Week at FBTB
|
|
Started up the new UCS Survey for LEGO - Posted news of the AAT and MTT hitting retail in the UK - Set up the first several steps for building Shaun's AT-ST - Wrote a column for the site - Posted belatedly about the 1999 LEGO Maniax exhibition in (...) (24 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: New Survey up for LEGO
|
|
(...) Making the Death Star as a UCS set wouldn't make sense. In order to make it large enough to see sufficient detail to justify the UCS status, it would have to be huge. I'm not interested in a $500 model that's essentially a gray sphere. I want (...) (24 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
