 | | Re: Lando and Mace
|
|
(...) I wouldn't count on the NBA minifigs setting any precedent. Note that the "street basketball" figs are in standard yellow. The collectors sets are of real people (and not actors portraying a fictional character). For those we have brown and (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jan-03, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: My impressions of the Imperial Star Destroyer Model ( some "spoilers")
|
|
(...) snip I think I will consider the sorting of the pieces as well. Normally I work with a big pile of pieces. Although with that many pieces I could get burried! Cheers Felix (22 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Lando and Mace
|
|
As I sit here slightly addled from the evening's festivities (check the date and hour), I have to wonder how this bit of news is not THEE item of hot discussion. I can't believe that TLC finally conceded that mini-yellow is/was not meant to (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jan-03, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO AT-AT and Hailfire Droid (Smaller links)
|
|
(...) I think that would be totally in order. We need to see some snowtroops besides in an AT-AT. It would be really cruel of Lego to make them available only through a very large set. I would also like them to make a rebel Taun-Taun with rider and (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jan-03, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: What's the big deal about the Mini TIE?
|
|
(...) Hehe, I remember seeing that. I thought "Wow, what a lame set!" But still, business is business. Kind of sneaky, yet funny. ~Evan Butzlaff (22 years ago, 1-Jan-03, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
|
|
(...) The only things on the ship that aren't perfectly mirrored are the detail 10x1 plates around the large trench, and the 10x2 detail plates on the tower. And those are only assymmetrical because they themselves are mirror images from the left to (...) (22 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
|
|
(...) Yes, I noticed that error. I had to refer to another picture of the bridge on the box to see if they were supposed to be flush or 1 stud away, and they were supposed to be flush. (...) Probably so. Or at least, I hope so. Otherwise you got (...) (22 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: My impressions of the Imperial Star Destroyer Model ( some "spoilers")
|
|
(...) Great summary of the experience of building the ISD, Bryan. I ended up spending around 17 hours myself, but only over a span of 2 days (26th and 27th). It was hard on the thumbs, but well worth it. Just a couple of things: (snip) (...) Myself, (...) (22 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: What's the big deal about the Mini TIE?
|
|
(...) Chicken Elmo! Tastes like chicken! Ticket Me Elmo! With radar detector! Patch Pack Kids! Help your kids overcome their smoking addiction! Care Bares! Who knew a teddy bear could be this um... fun. ;^) :^D ~GAMH (22 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
|
|
(...) I must agree with Matt. I enjoyed the original review overall, but I have "flown" the ISD around by removing the tower sections and using the internal frame as a handle as well, and I have never had a single plate or greeblie fall off. We're (...) (22 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.loc.au)
|
