Subject:
|
Re: Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Tue, 31 Dec 2002 19:58:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5351 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.reviews, Bryan Wong writes:
> In lugnet.reviews, Kerry Raymond writes:
> > Errors
> >
> > I don't recall any missing parts. There were no errors in the building
> > instructions, but in some steps the quantity of certain heavily-used small
> > parts was not stated. As it is easy to visually overlook a small part being
> > added to a sub-assembly that already has hundreds of parts, knowing how many
> > should have been used in total in each step is a useful cross-check.
>
> I'm not sure if it was only me, but I noticed some discrepancies with the
> deflector shield domes ("golf balls"). Most steps show one dome flush
> against the edge of the plate it sits on, and the other dome 1 stud away
> from the edge. Can someone else verify this?
Yes, I noticed that error. I had to refer to another picture of the bridge
on the box to see if they were supposed to be flush or 1 stud away, and they
were supposed to be flush.
> At the end I found myself short 1 2x8 lt grey plate. But I probably used
> one where I wasn't supposed to...
Probably so. Or at least, I hope so. Otherwise you got stiffed one piece.
-Greg "Fox" Cook
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
|
| (...) I'm not sure if it was only me, but I noticed some discrepancies with the deflector shield domes ("golf balls"). Most steps show one dome flush against the edge of the plate it sits on, and the other dome 1 stud away from the edge. Can someone (...) (22 years ago, 29-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
