To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.reviewsOpen lugnet.reviews in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Reviews / 1017
1016  |  1018
Subject: 
Re: Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars
Date: 
Sun, 29 Dec 2002 19:23:41 GMT
Viewed: 
5248 times
  
In lugnet.reviews, Kerry Raymond writes:
Errors

I don't recall any missing parts. There were no errors in the building
instructions, but in some steps the quantity of certain heavily-used small
parts was not stated. As it is easy to visually overlook a small part being
added to a sub-assembly that already has hundreds of parts, knowing how many
should have been used in total in each step is a useful cross-check.

I'm not sure if it was only me, but I noticed some discrepancies with the
deflector shield domes ("golf balls").  Most steps show one dome flush
against the edge of the plate it sits on, and the other dome 1 stud away
from the edge.  Can someone else verify this?

At the end I found myself short 1 2x8 lt grey plate.  But I probably used
one where I wasn't supposed to...

-Bryan



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
 
(...) Ah, yes, now I remember. The rest of the manual all showed one dome 1 stud away, but on the pictures both are flush. I just put mine flush, I think it's a typo. I snapped a picture with my camera of it: (URL) (22 years ago, 29-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars)
  Re: Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
 
"Bryan Wong" <green_paper@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:H7wB7H.GFs@lugnet.com... (...) small (...) being (...) many (...) Uh? Was it a typo? I thought i should be like that and built one flush against the edge and the other 1 stud away. When (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars)
  Re: Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
 
(...) Yes, I noticed that error. I had to refer to another picture of the bridge on the box to see if they were supposed to be flush or 1 stud away, and they were supposed to be flush. (...) Probably so. Or at least, I hope so. Otherwise you got (...) (22 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars)

Message is in Reply To:
  Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
 
10030 System / Star Wars / Ultimate Collector Series Imperial Star Destroyer [official Lego name, abbreviated henceforth to ISD] Natasha Stott Despoja [unofficial lugnet.loc.au name] Ages 16+, 3104 pieces, (C) 2002 [so says the box] Manual: 228 A3 (...) (22 years ago, 28-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.loc.au) ! 

13 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR