 | | Re: New Sets 2003
|
|
(...) I think these are due to come out next January, but those store clerks always make mistakes and sell stuff earlier... Could somebody e-mail me with pictures, too? I already saw them, but I want to have a closer look at these new sets. -JHK (22 years ago, 11-Oct-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: New Sets 2003
|
|
Thankyou very much Tobbe. Looking over them now.... ooooh. mmm... sherpa hats... scimitars... hang on, is that Clifford in 7411? When do they hit the shops? Allister (...) (22 years ago, 11-Oct-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: X-PodWing Fighter
|
|
That's great. You did a good job keeping it accurate yet poddish. I like the R2 unit in the back. I need to get my first Star Wars pod finished soon, or someone's going to beat me to it. (...) (22 years ago, 11-Oct-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Nano scale spacecraft
|
|
(...) Thanks. I actually made those almost as a joke when I had made my little nano-ISD: (URL) someone on FBTB said I should make some TIEs to scale. Well, this was pretty much the smallest I could do, though those would still be pretty huge next (...) (22 years ago, 11-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Nano scale spacecraft
|
|
(...) to (...) Although they are too big (like about double the size they should be for scale) I think they look way better than just 1x1 plates. It think that is about as small as you can make them without being sort of silly. (Like I did with my (...) (22 years ago, 11-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: New Sets 2003
|
|
(...) I read Ringworld while on vacation earlier this year, in-between planning my Blockade Runner. Good book. (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: New Sets 2003
|
|
(...) <delurk> Since the page has obviously had the clamps put on it and I missed the window of opportunity, could one of you guys that did manage to see them go through your 'downloaded internet files' directory and email me a copy of them pretty (...) (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: New Sets 2003
|
|
"Tony Knaak" <tknaaker@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:H3s07s.F9r@lugnet.com... (...) too; (...) What are you guy's TALKING about? That webpage doesn't even exist! -- Mnarkham Carroll (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: X-PodWing Fighter
|
|
Nice design Chris. I never thought of that approach. I can't fault you for flimsy wing - mine pop off when I open them. At least your X-wing can land. (...) (cut) (...) (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | New MOC: X-PodWing Fighter
|
|
Hi all, The pod trend continues. First we had Gil doin' his thing, then Jamie decides to morph some StarWars into the mix. Then I get the idea of doing the X-wing, pod style, and Travis Dickinson beats me to it. But I prevail! Here's my version: (...) (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Nano scale spacecraft
|
|
(...) They look fine to me. Are you gonna create the Death Star run or something b/c I see 2 TIEs and Vader's TIE. Hasta La Vista, Sean (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Nano scale spacecraft
|
|
(...) Any thoughts on whether my nano-scale TIEs are around the right scale? (URL) (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: New Sets 2003
|
|
Agreed on all points emphatically. It goes without saying that all the new SW releases are superb. The only one I might not get is the TIE bomber as it looks so far to be a simple remake as others have noted. In a moment of weakness however, I'll (...) (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Reissue of MOC: Moisture Vaporator
|
|
(...) How's the homestead coming? It'd be great to see a teaser if your not done. Hasta La Vista, Sean (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: New Sets 2003
|
|
(...) Hey Jeff, you're a fan of the Kzinti? I love the Man-Kzin wars!! You're the only person I know who has ever mentioned the series! Grrrreat books=) -Matt (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: New Sets 2003
|
|
(...) Jon you are absolutely right! All these new sets rock, especialy the new super ball joints (can't wait to use on a mecha!). Just as a side note too; since all these sets are going to be coming in to stores, be watching for good clearance deals (...) (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: New Sets 2003
|
|
(...) I think your being optimistic with regards to the price. I'd say $3.99-$5.99 range. It looks to me like the sets come with about 50 pcs each. Still nice though. Jonathan (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: New Sets 2003
|
|
(...) I wish we'd seen more of the AT-TE on EPII. Very cool. (...) I don't know--the AT-ST looked to be about the same scale. 8^) (...) 'Nuff said. Dave! (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: New Sets 2003
|
|
Wow! The AT-TE is definately a steping stone to a possible AT-AT. The micro-fig scale Star Wars stuff is too big to be to scale with the (nano-fig scale) USC Star Destroyer. On the other hand they are really cool looking, and if they are (as they (...) (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Nano scale spacecraft
|
|
(...) Wow. Those are really cool looking. The only thing is they are way too big to be to scale with the UCS Star Destroyer. I got the impression that the nano scale star wars sets would be capital ships. The reason for that, is the fighters to (...) (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.loc.au)
|
