 | | Re: 7130 What's the Deal?
|
|
(...) I have a 7130, and it's among one of the few sets I've kept in one piece. Perhaps it's just the notion that it's star wars, and it has an excellent design, that I kept the original model still built in the box. I still proudly display it on my (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: 7130 What's the Deal?
|
|
(...) For me, it's simple. It *looks* like what it's supposed to look like. The design and coloring are excellent. The use of traditional parts and specialty parts is well balanced. Oh, and did I mention that it *looks* like a snowspeeder? :) Nice (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: new set availability
|
|
"John R. Beck" <jbeck@naturecenter.org> wrote in message news:GuzAEs.AyI@lugnet.com... (...) Shame, it's a nice set. Looks great next to my TV :) Unfortunately I walked in a LEGO stockist with a lot of cash in my pocket at the weekend after selling (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: 7130 Snowspeeder....
|
|
"Matthew Sekerak" <matthew.sekerak@verizon.net> wrote in message news:Guz1Du.B3y@lugnet.com... (...) hours (...) My 2 1/2 year old loves this set - she spends ages "swooshing" it and pretending Luke and Dack are talking to each other. This is her (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Question about building an AT-AT
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Tobbe Arnesson writes:I can (...) Well, the problem being mostly that at present I can just move the legs nearly instantly to where I want, using only one hand (the other hand is needed [and whatever else I can use]) to balance (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
