|  |  | Re: Blockade Runner on Shop@Home 
 | 
 | 
| Try checking again... It's listed on the Lego website now as product #10019 (...)    (24 years ago, 5-Oct-01, to lugnet.starwars) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Blockade Runner on Shop@Home 
 | 
 | 
| (...) Of course some of us will buy it just for the new dark red pieces... ;-) JohnG, GMLTC    (24 years ago, 4-Oct-01, to lugnet.starwars) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Blockade Runner on Shop@Home 
 | 
 | 
| Ok, I followed the links and have seen the pictures and, yeah, it's what we should expect from TLG - a set that will get Star Wars nuts like us buying it but also appealling to little Billy looking for that one Xmas gift to pester mum & dad for. (...)   (24 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.starwars) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Pics up for the RBR and Maul at S@H 
 | 
 | 
| (...) Runner" because the rebellion only has one. --Kevin W. §    (24 years ago, 4-Oct-01, to lugnet.starwars) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: The Brick Testament 
 | 
 | 
| Do you think having Jar Jar in the garden of Eden has anything to do with Adam's downfall? Maybe he is just back luck? :) ( (URL) ) I also liked how Noah is upset about the change in project requirements late in the production phase. ( (URL) ) (...)   (24 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.build.ancient, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.photography) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Pics up for the RBR and Maul at S@H 
 | 
 | 
| (...) More likely (sorry, I don't have any references), the Tantive IV was registered as an Alderaanian ship. It would make sense for a Senator from Alderaan to use one of her home planet's ships. Also, Alderaan was a member of the Empire, but was (...)   (24 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.starwars) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Pics up for the RBR and Maul at S@H 
 | 
 | 
| (...) Remember, one should always devalue the information given in SW:EGVV by a goodly amount ... for example, it lists the height of the AT-AT as ~15m, which is much too small to be reconciled with the scenes in the movies [1]. EGVV does a nice job (...)   (24 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.starwars) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Pics up for the RBR and Maul at S@H 
 | 
 | 
| (...) <clip> (...) of (...) Well according to "Star Wars: The Essential Guide to Vechicles and Vessels" - [ The famous "Rebel Blockade Runner" in acutality was a single ship named the Tantive IV. A Corellian corvette, the ship was registered as a (...)   (24 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.starwars) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Pics up for the RBR and Maul at S@H 
 | 
 | 
| (...) Its funny but I actually think your suggestion is the only way to make the model look as it is supposed to. Most people will probably not keep it like that though. Yes I wanted grey parts but as a model it would have been more astheticly (...)   (24 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.starwars) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Pics up for the RBR and Maul at S@H 
 | 
 | 
| (...) would (...) IV. (...) Well the "Star Wars: Behind the Magic" CD-ROM it states; (not verbatim, but close enough) that the Empire belived the 'Rebel Blockade Runner' was a massive ship with enough firepower to defeat several Star Destroyers. (...)   (24 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.starwars) 
 |