|
|
 | | Re: Episode II named
|
| (...) I think George is just trying to get back at a lot of people. A lot of people were upset with the title of TPM because they said it was too vague. Some people couldn't figure out that Palpatine was the actual "Menace" of the movie and not (...) (23 years ago, 31-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Episode II named
|
| Jaco & All, (...) Well, this is what the website states as the criteria for this group: "LEGO®/Star Wars®: products (information, opinions, reviews, licensing issues, etc.); building (settings, contexts, characters, projects, models, layouts, plans, (...) (23 years ago, 30-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Modular sets
|
| (...) For now we can make a Hutt by just sticking a dinosaur tail onto a Bob the Builder fig :] What scares me is LEGO's solution may not be all that different! KDJ ___...___ LUGNETer #203, Windsor, Ontario, Canada (23 years ago, 30-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Episode II named
|
| People! If you want to discuss about the title please go to (URL) continue there. IMHO the main topic here should be "Star Wars LEGO" and not "Star Wars". Furthermore I have done some research on how and why George Lucas named this film AOTC and I (...) (23 years ago, 30-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Modular sets
|
| Alexander Johnston <Areas-4@excite.com> wrote in message news:GIuB7B.DEn@lugnet.com... (...) Jabba's palace would be cool too, with a trap door, a rancor, and a hutt minifig! --- Markham (23 years ago, 29-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: TLG Article in "Fast Company".
|
| (...) I just read this article. People can find it on the web here: (URL) was a very good treatment about what Lego has to do to keep up with the times. Many of the themes that we complain about here are found in this article. They spent a great (...) (23 years ago, 29-Aug-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.technic.bionicle)
| | | | | Re: Modular sets
|
| (...) (23 years ago, 29-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Episode II named
|
| (...) Yes, but one can still hope that George will recover the artistic vision of ANH and TESB. I won't pilgrimage to the theaters with the same zealous optimism as I had when Ep 1 was released, but I still look forward to Ep. 2's release. If (...) (23 years ago, 29-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Episode II named
|
| (...) Gee, by that criteria these movies may actually have been well-named because MST3K is undoubtedly where they are headed! I have seen Episode I exactly once, maybe someday I will see the subsequent films for free on TV or something because I do (...) (23 years ago, 29-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Episode II named
|
| (...) That's what I've hoped since 1983 when RoTJ came out. George is just playing with us. Those ewoks are just stand-ins. He'll bring the Wookies out when the *real* movie is released. james, who shudders at the image of Lego ewoks. (23 years ago, 29-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
|
