 | | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
|
(...) The even sadder thing is that the snowspeeder is one of the few SW models Lego's made that's actually LARGER than it 'should' be-- making the required AT-AT foot even bigger :) If I recall correctly, the 7130 is 18 studs long, making it about (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
|
If you consider that LEGO uses existing pieces where they can, I can imagine each foot would use one of those tiny "saucer" pieces like the AT-ST foot, or the Millenium Falcon landing gear. Which would be fine, because if it were TOO big, yikes! I'd (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
|
(...) Is anyone else a member of the Star Wars Fan club? I've written a question to Steve Sansweet about the scales used (actual scales of models) and represented (how big they are supposed to be). "If" I get an answer maybe we could get closer to a (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic C-3P0: My First Impression
|
|
Hi, I think I read in here of someone w/ the same strange problem as me: In my Stormtrooper box was a 3P0!! I called lego to tell them of the mistake. I didn't mind this though, since the S.T. looks like...well....CRAP!! :7) Jono (26 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
|
BUT if you go strictly by the fact that the foot of the AT-AT covers the Snowspeeder and take into account the size of the LEGO Snowspeeder. In order to accomplish the AT-AT foot being the right size it would HAVE to be HUGE. This would also support (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
