 | | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
|
(...) A more refined guess: 80' - 96' (...) I checked snowspeeder length a bit more closely. They're about 16 feet long, +/- a foot. So revamp that guess to 60' - 68' (a little over in each case). (...) I still agree with this 60' - 93' measurement, (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
|
(...) Well I do agree that 50' would just seem too small. The version I made at (URL) Is slightly smaller than minifig scale and according to the stud height, it's over 50'. (And if you look at my picture, don't rag on me about the head, I know it's (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic C-3P0: My First Impression
|
|
(...) Can you provide a list of what parts you do get in the gold/silver color? (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
|
(...) Forgive me if I sound like I'm ranting about the size of the AT-AT... It's really not all THAT important-- and I'm SURE if we actually measured the models used in the movies, got the distance to camera of the filming of the little luke (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: UCS Inspired Minifig Scale T-65 X-Wing
|
|
(...) Thanks Admiral...ahem..."Grand" Admiral Sandlin! Mark Chan P.S. After several weeks, I'm still trying to assemble the parts to replicate your MotoTek Shiva (great model - looks like it belongs in Neo-Tokyo from the movie Akira). I accidently (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: UCS Inspired Minifig Scale T-65 X-Wing
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) My thanks to both of you for pointing this out. I found a few pairs on Brickbay. They will come in handy...somewhere (or at least, that's what I keep telling myself to justify all the rest of the lego parts I've collected over the (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Technic C-3P0: My First Impression
|
|
Yesterday I saw boxes of 8008, the Technic Stormtrooper, at the nearby TRU. I bought one, and when I opened the box, surpringly I found not a Stormtrooper, but a 8007 C-3P0 inside. No matter. I like C-3P0, too. After I built it, sadly I must say the (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars Technic C-3PO & Stormtrooper
|
|
(...) I guess I'm going shopping tomorrow!!! Joe (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
|
(...) Hey All, I don't want to sound rude but why not avoid the "argument" and confusion. I haven't read all of this conversation but according to my blueprints the AT-AT is 15.5 meters equaling 50.8524 feet. Why not just go with 50 feet? Joe (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
|
(...) <fanatic level=almost_there> Very true. There's a lot to consider :) There are a couple key scenes to derive the AT-AT's actual height. 1. Luke ascending to the underbelly (there's a shot available on www.starwars.com) 2. The foot trampling (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
