|
|
 | | Re: 7106, 7126, 7166
|
| CUTE??? Its an Imperial AT-ST!!! The designers designed it to look fearsome, deadly, and intimidating! Aauugghh! Ahem. Well I don't think it looks cute, I do think it is fairly good considering the price, and the fact that Lego Designers obviously (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Review: 7127 AT-ST
|
| (...) a few modifications help a lot. whoever designed the legs on this thing must have been trying to make it hard to stand. (...) I think it looks pretty good, for the most part. (...) well, the primary colors are not very visible, thanks to the (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: 7106, 7126, 7166
|
| (...) I love it. I'm having AT-ST, AT-ST, AT-ST, AT-ST, AT-ST, AT-ST, spam and AT-ST for lunch. If LEGO can't give us the goods in the "way-over priced" range of old, at least they are making a bunch of these "decent as a main model but really good (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: 7106, 7126, 7166
|
| (...) For some reason I had it in my head that the AT-ST was $15, so I was pretty happy when I saw it was only $10. I agree that the parts were great, but I really would have been happier with even a $15 set and just a little more - a better hip (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: 7106, 7126, 7166
|
| (...) I like it, too. It's a cute, fun, set. Everything Lego should be. Not to say I wouldn't want to see a UCS version to minifig scale. Kevin (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
|
