Subject:
|
Re: Monorails
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Mon, 27 Sep 1999 09:42:13 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
LEGO@antispamSONGTWO.DEMON.CO.UK
|
Viewed:
|
1760 times
|
| |
|
|
Paul Baulch wrote:
>
> Greg Majewski wrote in message ...
>
> > so I thought of using a monorail. The only
> Is it possible to concatenate single railway track pieces without using the
> dk-grey sleeper "clip" pieces, i.e. just with normal studs? If it is, then
> perhaps you could use a single strip of railway track for the rail, and the
> cars could use alternating inward-pointing train wheels to straddle the
> track on each side. It might be challenging to get the cars' centre of
> gravity low enough to not tip over by building them downward a lot on each
> side (and keep side clearance on curves), but then such solutions would
> probably also hide the train wheels nicely, as well as give the cars that
> nice "straddling-the-rail" look.
>
> Oh, and this method doesn't even address the problem of how to motorise it.
> :-)
>
> Paul
From what I remember of my old-style railway tracks, it is. Lego
themselves did a monorail this way once:
-> http://www.brickshelf.com/scans/6000/6970/6970-08.jpg
although it didn't have curves. The other problem is that, if you're not
a train fan, coming by curves can be quite tricky, although you could do
a large monorail with a couple of straight and curved track sets. (Are
these S@H only in the US?)
:: paul (confusing isn't it?)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Monorails
|
| Greg Majewski wrote in message ... (...) want (...) problem (...) how (...) Is it possible to concatenate single railway track pieces without using the dk-grey sleeper "clip" pieces, i.e. just with normal studs? If it is, then perhaps you could use (...) (27 years ago, 25-Sep-99, to lugnet.space)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
