 | | Re: Atmospheric Mecha Carrier Update! —Paul Baulch
|
| | | "Mark Sandlin" <sandlin@nwlink.com> wrote in message news:B6BE8C53.DD02%s...ink.com... (...) This saying drives me up the wall. I mean, surely it's cheaper to use lead than depleted uranium? Or to build a jet without ejector seats? My point is that (...) (24 years ago, 25-Feb-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Atmospheric Mecha Carrier Update! —Jonathan Mizner
|
| | | | | (...) power of depleted uranium shells :) That's the only thing I can think of... And if they don't include ejection seats, someone will get upset (depends on who finds out). What was the point of your reply exactly? (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Atmospheric Mecha Carrier Update! —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | (...) <snip> (...) <snip> I think your statement is the source of your issue. The phrase isn't meant to justify a less interesting design. (Besides, why would I be trying to justify something Mladen built when I don't know his reasons?) It's a (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | |
