 | | back on track ... —Paul Hartzog
|
| | | well, i don't know how this thread got so off-topic so fast but after more discussion in chat, the bottom line here is NOT TO IMPOSE a standard on anyone, turns out there are a few salient points: 1. std for minifig airlocks is diff than 2. std for (...) (24 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: back on track ... —Duane Hess
|
| | | | | (...) I'm am going to assume that you are referring to the Hexadyne Consortium discussion. As I understand it (Joel may be able to explain better than I, since it's his baby) the Consortium is a voluntary guild which developes standards in order to (...) (24 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: back on track ... —Joel Kuester
|
| | | | | | (...) actually, your explaination is extremely well-worded! I'm not sure if he is referring to the Consortium or not, the original post was about everybody here in .space using the same shape and size of airlock to connect ships, and I think he was (...) (24 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: back on track ... —Duane Hess
|
| | | | | | (...) Thank you. (...) That is the aspect of the Consortium that I am most likely to participate in. I am not overly concerned with the competition. I feel that I would rarely enter my ships. What I do like is the ability to assign statistics such (...) (24 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: back on track ... —William R. Ward
|
| | | | | (...) How about this idea: hold a contest. Post it in lugnet.build.contests and everything. People submit proposals for docking rings or airlocks or whatever, and then people vote on the proposals, and whichever is the most popular can be adopted as (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Docking Ring Standards —William R. Ward
|
| | | | (...) How about this idea: hold a contest. Post it in lugnet.build.contests and everything. People submit proposals for docking rings or airlocks or whatever, and then people vote on the proposals, and whichever is the most popular can be adopted as (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Docking Ring Standards —Paul Hartzog
|
| | | | this is a really great idea a cooperative contest wherein although there is competition, there is an underlying desire for a cooperative outcome. the only problem is that a standard is made by people actually using the idea in their MOCs so just (...) (24 years ago, 8-Mar-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Docking Ring Contest [was: Re: Docking Ring Standards] —William R. Ward
|
| | | | (...) Thank you. (...) Great! I'm looking forward to it. I'm kind of new around here, so I am glad someone more established is willing to run it. What would the rules be? I've noticed that some of us are more strict than others about what (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | |
