Subject:
|
Re: Workbee (Star Trek MOC)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Sat, 10 Feb 2001 23:35:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
914 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Paul Hartzog writes:
> very cool,
> because its useful :-)
>
> while we're on the topic,
> how come there's so much SW lego on the web
> and so very little ST?
>
> personally i prefer Star Trek
>
> -p
>
>
Me too. Not that I dislike SW, no, not at all. It's just that even if it
is fantasy, ST put a lot more emphasis on explaining how they solved
problems. And in doing so developed a believable (well, within context)
"technology". I follow that technology very loosely, but for me it has
helped me to design systems into my ships that have at least *some*
function. Unlike classic space, in which an "engine" was an oversized
rocket cone that was attached to a 2x2 90 degree modified plate. In other
words, where the heck was the engine? And the fuel? :^| I always had a
problem with that. Some people have created their own technology, and
that's really good also because they too have shown great detail. I
personally think that when you already have a large creation, it's nice to
see some technological detail. Like Mark's most recent freighter. The
engine area was huge!
:^) Of course, this is coming from me, Mr.Plain-boxy-ship. I think I will
continue to examine all the MOCs by you great AFOL's out there closely for
detailing ideas.
~Trev
Astro Lift Co.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
