 | | Re: Scale Question
|
| Somebody really should post a offical (or close) scale list on a web site. This way everyone would know what the scales were in relation to normal model building. Just my $.02 worth...:) Matthew Morley (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jan-01, to lugnet.space)
| | | | | Re: Scale Question
|
| (...) I disagree, I think that setting up some sort of "official" scaling would be a bad idea. I would hate to think that everytime I post a MOC I'd have to worry about someone saying: "That's really neat but it's not to scale, citing section A417 (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jan-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build)
| | | | | Re: Scale Question
|
| (...) I'm with you, Bryan. Scale schmale. I build things so they "look" right. ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (23 years ago, 29-Jan-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build)
| | | | | Re: Scale Question
|
| (...) I disagree with this for many reasons: LEGO spaceship MOCs are not real - there is no true size to guage scale from. The application of 'fig-scale' helps to indicate how big we think it should be. There is no 'accurate' scaling that applies to (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jan-01, to lugnet.space)
| | | | | Re: Scale Question
|
| Mark Sandlin <sandlin@nwlink.com> wrote in message news:B69AE5FE.BC3B%s...ink.com... (...) would be (...) to (...) the (...) with (...) Me too,I'm with you guys. Gary (23 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build)
| | | | | Re: Scale Question
|
| (...) I hope no one thinks I am trying to format such an idea. My question was more to find out what method others are using in describing their MOC's and Scales. I have a better idea now that I know that some builders are using Humans as 1:1 and (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.space)
| |
