| |
Todd Lehman writes:
> Oh, BTW -- it's playing with fire to try to pick "realistic" set numbers
> unless you know the product line REALLY well. A set the size of the one
> you made would not have a number like 6888, but would have a number like
> 6924, 6936, or 6945. Put that in your pipe and smoke it. :-) :-)
I take it that my model is too big to have a 688x number?
Well, 6888 was the number I used for my Pentapterigoid fighter, so rather
than looking up more numbers, I just used that. So I should try to remember
that 6922, 6924, 6934-7, and 6944-8 are free, huh? :)
--Bram
Bram Lambrecht
BXL34@po.cwru.edu
http://home.cwru.edu/~bxl34/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Classic Space set 6888
|
| Oh, BTW -- it's playing with fire to try to pick "realistic" set numbers unless you know the product line REALLY well. A set the size of the one you made would not have a number like 6888, but would have a number like 6924, 6936, or 6945. Put that (...) (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.build.contests, lugnet.space)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
