To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 36431 (-10)
  Re: The INRI Deep Space Starfighter: Salvation is at hand!
 
Memo to all the .space-lurkers out there....if you are hesitant to post because you think your moc will not get any attention, just attach J.C. to the hull and watch the responses flood in. You'll get the people who are offended, people who will in (...) (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
 
  Re: The INRI Deep Space Starfighter: Salvation is at hand!
 
(...) Seperated for emphais and I THINK it would be (...) which isn't really making it FOR ME. (...) Capitalization emphasis added. (...) Dude, perhaps you should think about reading sentences in their entiriety, and in the context of surrounding (...) (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space)
 
  Re: The INRI Deep Space Starfighter: Salvation is at hand!
 
(...) but it's (...) would be (...) MOCs. (...) Dan, slap me for saying so, but I think you need to work a little subtlety into your critiques. How about saying that you would prefer something more ornate instead of declaring that it would be (...) (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space)
 
  Oh relax, Peter!
 
(...) Can't you appreciate a little satire? After all, if you can't laugh at yourself, you're just leaving the job to others. Dave (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space)
 
  Re: The INRI Deep Space Starfighter: Salvation is at hand!
 
(...) Is that a warning 'Itsy Nuclear Reactor Inside' ? (...) Landing gear ? You mean it doesn't just embed in the mud like Genesis ? (...) Is that the Hand of god ? (...) Was that an easy conversion for them to make ? (...) pete.w (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
 
  Re: A little introduction and two MOCs
 
(...) Thanks for the comments. That little bot was an afterthought, but I like it. I think I will take some separate photos of it. About the Endeavour, I would have liked it to be at a larger scale, but my tiny LEGO collection said no. And I (...) (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space)
 
  Re: A little introduction and two MOCs
 
(...) Thanks for the comments Yeah I know about the cockpit, but i couldn't find a good way to connect it at a straighter angle. But the parts just fell into place and this was the result. I am innocent =) But as I said to Tony, I am thinking about (...) (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space)
 
  Re: A little introduction and two MOCs
 
(...) The idea of a pre-pre classic space was just a last resort to have something to write on about it at all. It wasn't meant to be of any specific era or have any specific purpose when I built it - I just threw together some bricks. The two long (...) (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space)
 
  Re: A little introduction and two MOCs
 
(...) Great. You will. Cheers! (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
 
  Re: A little introduction and two MOCs
 
(...) Sorry Tony, no functions on either one (oh yeah, the ventral turret on the Endeavour is rotatable, but that's really no function..) Both of them started without any exact plans, so they i didn't make place for funciotn. But it would be (...) (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR