To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 35895
35894  |  35896
Subject: 
Re: Tanks or Power Armor
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space
Date: 
Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:09:56 GMT
Viewed: 
261 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Joseph Sibilia-Young wrote:
   I was thinking these would be more for clambering around and inside capital ships, not so much for zero-g combat as you imply. The suits would reach their targets in projectile pods (ala Heinlein) or use “point-n-shoot” thrusters attached centrally to their torsos to jump distances (ibid).

I guess I could see that. I’m not sure a true humanoid shape would be the optimal way to go, given how tall it’d have to be to accomodate a human pilot, but a walker of some sort could have the advantage of being able to claw its way around, reducing the likelihood that unexpected manouvers would cause it to crash into stuff.

Of course, the main point of engaging the enemy within their own ship would theoretically be to capture the ship, so anything that can’t fit through the constricted passageways that are likely to be used in a space combat vessel could end up damaging the ship beyond the point where it’s worth even trying to salvage parts, much less the whole ship. As likely as not, in-ship combat would probably be carried out by some equivalent of Space Marines, wearing what would essentially be armored spacesuits, and being inserted with small ships that would latch onto the exterior hull and blow holes through the hull for the troops to go through.

   I intended to say that it would be pretty funny to see one of todays tanks zooming around in space taking fire from warships.

Yeah, I understood what you were saying, but it’s most closely related to aerial combat. It’s only fair to compare military advantage with tanks when dealing with ground-based combat. Fighter jets are better suited for aerial combat than tanks, and tanks are better suited for ground combat than fighter jets. A completely different combat platform would be required for space-based combat, as tanks wouldn’t have ground to drive on and aircraft wouldn’t have air to steer with.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Tanks or Power Armor
 
(...) I was thinking these would be more for clambering around and inside capital ships, not so much for zero-g combat as you imply. The suits would reach their targets in projectile pods (ala Heinlein) or use "point-n-shoot" thrusters attached (...) (20 years ago, 26-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space, FTX)

50 Messages in This Thread:






















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR