| |
In lugnet.starwars, Chris Yoder wrote:
> In lugnet.starwars, Kyle D. Jackson wrote:
> > In lugnet.starwars, Chris Yoder wrote:
> > > ...it's a natural play on words to have a Tri-wing fighter.
> >
> > I think there's already a T-Wing fighter with 3 "wings".
> >
> > You've made a neat looking _airplane_, but I can't see the connection
> > to Star Wars. Why does it have a propeller? Why doesn't the cockpit
> > have a canopy? It has tires---can't it hover? It doesn't much match
> > the hype of the announcement...
>
> Answers to questions. It was made for the Rebellion. (Plus, it has Rebellion
> plates on the wings.) To provide thrust to fly. Because it's an open cockpit
> aircraft. It can't hover, but it can fly very slow. My MOCs never do.
>
> > But it's a nice airplane. ;]
>
> Thanks.
Say, I hear tell there's this "Terran Federation" what's
looking for a few ships of some kind--*any* kind--and maybe
they would be interested in buying some. I mean, they *do*
have three thousand seven hundred somethingorother sectors
to patrol and all.
(sorry)
LFB
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Tri-Wing Fighter Redux
|
| (...) Answers to questions. It was made for the Rebellion. (Plus, it has Rebellion plates on the wings.) To provide thrust to fly. Because it's an open cockpit aircraft. It can't hover, but it can fly very slow. My MOCs never do. (...) Thanks. (...) (20 years ago, 18-May-04, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
28 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
