| | Re: News on the 2000 space line!
|
|
Paul Baulch wrote ... (...) Well, maybe, but if they have a Star Wars logo, and it´s printed Star Wars on the package, then... Well, I don´t know. Maybe they could think like that, but... I´ll get my answers in December. (...) I have heard that (...) (25 years ago, 1-Nov-99, to lugnet.space)
|
|
| | Re: News on the 2000 space line!
|
|
(...) I agree with this point 100%! The people who write letters and answer the phones over in Enfield or Billund usually don't know 99% of the finer points that über-nerds like ourselves are privy to. I'm willing to bet that his/her usage of the (...) (25 years ago, 1-Nov-99, to lugnet.space)
|
|
| | Re: News on the 2000 space line!
|
|
Tobias Möller wrote in message ... (...) Space. (...) in (...) Yeah, but why would TLG necessarily use this reasoning[1]? For all we know the TLG person answering your mail might think that SW counts as Space, or even the whole company might think (...) (25 years ago, 1-Nov-99, to lugnet.space)
|
|
| | Re: News on the 2000 space line!
|
|
(...) Hee! Todd actually asked me about this before (not about my triple identity, but as to why the last few ASCII characters in my postings get chopped. I still don't know why this happens. I'll clear up my identities for posterity (but don't (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.space)
|
|
| | Re: News on the 2000 space line!
|
|
Parallax wrote in message ... (...) Billund (...) are (...) just a (...) in (...) I think that we uber-nerds know a little too much for our own good.... and speculate a thousand times as much. I don't blame them for trying to keep their lives as (...) (25 years ago, 3-Nov-99, to lugnet.space)
|
|
| | Re: News on the 2000 space line!
|
|
Parallax wrote in message ... (...) a (...) And it was an ugly piece of crud to boot! ;-) Paul [My Page: (URL) Update soon] (25 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.space)
|