|
 | | Re: Pirate-flavoured Tugboat
|
| (...) Thanks for the compliments, Jon! My most favorite bit about this thing is that it manages to go "Vroom Vroom" in space. My least favorite bit, however, is the click-hinges holding on the ruddy rocket engine thingies. Jon, as you're one of the (...) (21 years ago, 10-May-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| |  | | Re: The Natty Ride (Civilian Contest Entry)
|
| (...) I really just had to, it's such a fun theme (and an excuse to use the 'taboo' black bricks in a spacecraft) (...) Thanks, Lenny! But I have to warn you, I am susceptible to flattery. -Kevin (21 years ago, 10-May-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| |  | | Re: Moonbase: Nailing down Moonway and Rail Standard
|
| (...) The second I hit send on my second message in this thread, yours showed up in the newsticker. Nice timing. I've considered the train car length and see what you mean. The first idea was just to keep the cars short, but I do see how that is (...) (21 years ago, 10-May-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains, FTX)
| |  | | Re: Moonbase: Nailing down Moonway and Rail Standard
|
| Me again. I was just catching up on the cool container threads that were going on awhile ago. Jason, Jake etc came up with some really great ideas. But this brings up a new issue. Most of the container ideas thrown around are 8 wide. This clashes (...) (21 years ago, 10-May-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains, FTX)
| |  | | Re: Moonbase: Nailing down Moonway and Rail Standard
|
| (...) Ouch. Please take into account that any train-like construction over a certain (very short) length needs to be put on svivel (SP?) bases in order to be kept on track. So even if then train car stays within 6 studs, a car of 24-32 studs length (...) (21 years ago, 10-May-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)
| |