|
|
 | | Re: New MOC: Orbital Manipulator Craft
|
| (...) Yeah, I s'pose you're right. Most of the time, though, that's what people do, slather tiles over a design until you've ruined the shape for the sake of studlessness. Now I will be sleeping, I have class tomorrow. Soren (22 years ago, 6-Mar-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: New MOC: Orbital Manipulator Craft
|
| (...) Using a lot of tiles is, in my view, sort of a cheat. True Studly-lessness is achieved because you're so SNOTed that there's no real top that needs tiling. For example the current (URL) MOC highlight...> (which bears raving about, it's tres (...) (22 years ago, 6-Mar-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: New MOC: Orbital Manipulator Craft
|
| (...) Dare I answer? (...) Studlessness is overrated, all it really says is that you've got the cash for hundreds of tiles. Studs actually help break up the hard lines where plates overlap, smoothing out the shapes. Try it sometime, it's (...) (22 years ago, 6-Mar-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Sci Fi Novels --> movies
|
| (...) I think you may have heard wrong. I first read Destination a long long time ago. I read CoMC about the same time and I've reread both of them several times since, and in my considered judgement, they're not at all alike. Not even close. Sure, (...) (22 years ago, 6-Mar-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: The Fly
|
| I don't know Ley, the thing on the nose looks suspiciously like a death ray. Coming from a Space Hippy like youreslf, this smacks of a military-industrial complex sell-out of some kind. Workin' for the Man now, eh Ley? Although I do like the fact (...) (22 years ago, 6-Mar-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
|
