 | | Re: Announcing DeepSpace.com —John Henry Kruer
|
| | | (...) Now, granted I probably won't bump again, but why would you say that? -JHK (20 years ago, 14-Jan-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Announcing DeepSpace.com —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | (...) Your preceding message indicates that you're well aware that bumping posts is unacceptable. I had hoped that you were more mature than some of the kids around here. Please don't prove me wrong. -Grand Admiral .space Curator (URL) (20 years ago, 14-Jan-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Announcing DeepSpace.com —Zac Soden
|
| | | | (...) Sorry Mark, but I just can't leave this thread without saying something. I'm not one to go stirring up potential arguements but I too wondered if anyone had actually noticed the post - the only indication of its function is the hit counters on (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jan-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | The practice of bumping ( was Re: Announcing DeepSpace.com —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | I'm not real keen on bump posts, and I don't usually like to see them.(1) The best bump posts, in my view, are the ones that you don't realise are actually bumps, because the post talks about a new facet of the topic or brings additional information (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jan-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Announcing DeepSpace.com —Chris Giddens
|
| | | | | (...) Guys, you have to be patient and establish the idea in the minds of the group. Honestly, a post that announces #1 a new site #2 a MOC #3 a new MOC #4 a new MOC and #5 a new MOC can be overload. The people just file the idea away and look for (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jan-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "Bumping" Posts (was: Announcing DeepSpace.com) —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | (...) I'm not sure why this is so hard to understand. If bumping posts becomes an accepted practice, then everyone who thinks they need more attention is going to do it. Then all of a sudden lugnet.space becomes lugnet.bumpymymoc and the top 20 (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jan-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "Bumping" Posts (was: Announcing DeepSpace.com) —Steve Runnels
|
| | | | | (...) I know mine are... :D --SteveR (20 years ago, 14-Jan-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "Bumping" Posts (was: Announcing DeepSpace.com) —Zac Soden
|
| | | | | In lugnet.space, Mark Sandlin wrote: snip (...) Okey dokey, well we've straightened out that bumping posts is not real cool. I'm sorry that I didn't explain the maturity thing the right way - I didn't intend for it to be insulting. I simply meant (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jan-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: "Bumping" Posts (was: Announcing DeepSpace.com) —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | | | In lugnet.space, Zac Soden wrote: (snip) (...) Which is precisely why I used the blunt tone with JHK. He's been around and knows the ropes, so I figured he could handle a terse reply. I think he's generally one of the most "grown up" younger spacers (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jan-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: "Bumping" Posts (was: Announcing DeepSpace.com) —John Henry Kruer
|
| | | | | | (...) Okay, okay, I get it now. Bumbing isn't cool. I was just in a kind of bad mood at the time, I guess. (...) Yeah, what I DONT want most is for any conlict to grow up here in .space. (...) Thanks, GM! -JHK (20 years ago, 14-Jan-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: "Bumping" Posts (was: Announcing DeepSpace.com) —Tyler Walles
|
| | | | | | | I fell really stupid to ask, but what is bumping? (20 years ago, 15-Jan-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: "Bumping" Posts (was: Announcing DeepSpace.com) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Bumping is replying to a post so that the topic moves back up the list of topics being discussed. It tends to be more prevalent on discussion group systems that have relatively few discussion areas and which show topics in the areas in reverse (...) (20 years ago, 15-Jan-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: "Bumping" Posts (was: Announcing DeepSpace.com) —Tyler Walles
|
| | | | | | | | (...) yes that does help,thanks (20 years ago, 15-Jan-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: "Bumping" Posts (was: Announcing DeepSpace.com) —John P. Henderson
|
| | | | | | (...) Huh? What? The GM rubs his eyes and yawns as if awoken from stasis. ;-) (URL) Mediator Hendo>> (20 years ago, 15-Jan-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "Bumping" Posts (was: Announcing DeepSpace.com) —Aaron Sneary
|
| | | | | (...) snip (...) snip (...) snip (...) This is SO condesending it demands to be ignored. (...) How odd. I normally find myself more on the side of the bumper and feel that the admonisher is being harsh. But this time, I'm with Mark all the way. JHK (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jan-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "Bumping" Posts (was: Announcing DeepSpace.com) —Allister McLaren
|
| | | | (...) Indeed. On the other hand, the discussion that has ensued as a result of your initial post hasn't done many favours to the signal to noise ration either. My feeling is that while JHK knew bumping was frowned upon, I didn't get the impression (...) (20 years ago, 15-Jan-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "Bumping" Posts (was: Announcing DeepSpace.com) —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | (...) Good suggestions, Allister. Thanks. -Grand Admiral .space Curator (URL) (20 years ago, 15-Jan-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| | | | |
