 | | Re: Spaceworld v. 1.0 —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | (...) looks great! But here are my point of contention: 1. Rather than a blue field, I would have preferred a starfield of some kind. If it must a blue field, go much darker with it -- towards indigo. 2. There are ripples of some sort in both the (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Spaceworld v. 1.0 —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | | (...) We have discussed placing it on a starfield for the front page. The blue I selected only because it simulates the blue 3x6 slope that I have with the logo on it. (...) Actually, that's supposed to look like they're "shiny" or have a brushed (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Spaceworld v. 1.0 —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | (...) (URL) Mark's Lego Creations (URL) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Spaceworld v. 1.0 —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | (...) other SW packaging...NOT! If you think that the blue and brown are reflections of anything but sky and ground from a planet surface -- well, you're just not facing the facts of how this air-brushed chrome look came about. Trust me on this. I (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Spaceworld v. 1.0 —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | (...) I'm aware of how the airbrushed chrome look came about. I was simply making a point that even the Star Wars folks have used the sky-and-ground chrome effect. Like I said, it's still being decided whether to use it. ~Mark (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Spaceworld v. 1.0 —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | (...) That's the worst argument for a doing a thing as I've ever heard. So because some nut in the art department for *gizmo* toys decides its cool to do chrome lettering this way, you follow suit? You can do better than that, Mark! In fact, i've (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Spaceworld v. 1.0 —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | (...) Thanks for the vote of confidence. I didn't say that's why *I* did the chrome thing. I already said a couple posts ago that I just tossed it in there to make it look flashy.... but anyway. (...) Ok, I'm sorry if I over-reacted to anything. (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Spaceworld v. 1.0 - Logo —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | | Mark, Well, I like the logo, and the lettering, it gives it a nice look. Outside of using the strict white lettering of the Classic series, I think it is appropriate for the site. The only other thing it might be is a techy look, but those are (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
