Subject:
|
Re: G .02
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Tue, 7 Oct 2003 14:39:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
467 times
|
| |
|
|
Thanks for the comments, guys.
I agree, the head could use some work. I do like the “personless” look, but it
still could be better.
And as far as the mobility of the model, it does maintain all of the flexibility
of the Armature. Unfortunately the armor is so heavy it does little more than
stand and point it’s guns. It’s a hulk, not an acrobat.
Maybe next time.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: G .02
|
| (...) Just for future reference, I find a small piece of paper in the ball joint stiffens them up nicely vis (URL) this pic> (you can see the poorly trimmed paper where the kneck joins the body). I tried (URL) Tony Knaak's> method (whatever happened (...) (21 years ago, 8-Oct-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | G .02
|
| Hello again guys and gals, I see I'm not the only one trying their hand at mech. (URL) Mine based off the Gla Gla Armature.> Pre-moderation goodness: (15 URLs) I'd be pleased to hear any comments or criticisms you may have. Thanks! (URL) (21 years ago, 6-Oct-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.build.mecha, FTX) !
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
