To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 27866
27865  |  27867
Subject: 
Re: Stacking Moonbases
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space
Date: 
Fri, 5 Sep 2003 01:59:00 GMT
Viewed: 
539 times
  
In lugnet.space, Aaron Sneary wrote:
  
Please understand that it is a VERY rough photoshop ‘sketch’ since I only had a few minutes in class to toss it together, but it will express my ideas to visual thinkers ok:

http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/asneary/Space/MMsupplements/modulelegs.gif


Whoa! How about having a larger standard internal diameter for vertical corridors? That would allow a bit more flexibility on how the corridors transport things vertically. I’d hate to have the standard mandate ladders or “antigravity devices”. I prefer mechanical lifts.

How about an 8x8 lift tube for people, and a 16x16 lift tube for cargo?

I agree with Jordan about just one vertical tube per module - more seems like overkill (but I would use additional non-tube stanchions for supporting upper modules as I think that flat module surfaces touching wouldn’t look any good).

The real problem is where the standard place should be. Central would be neatest, but there’s real benefit from placing a lift bay to the side if a module has a large enclosure.

I’m leaning towards saying that the standard specify a vertical module separation (does it have that already?) and positions for supports, but that they needn’t be tubes - and leave that to modules built specifically for it i.e. To go to an upper module, a minifig would travel to a nearby “lift module”, go upstairs, then horizontally out to the destination module. That way, groups designing a moonbase can plan ahead to make sure they have an adequate number of “lift modules”. Note that a “lift module” needn’t be merely for lifts - it can still have a cool primary purpose e.g. a multi-level space hotel.

Cheers,





Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Stacking Moonbases
 
(...) If you're going to get so complex as to build a lift, you might as well be making just a single moonbase that's very tall. Something like this one: (URL) After considering this some more, I'm thinking that having a vertical connection standard (...) (21 years ago, 5-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Stacking Moonbases
 
(...) Please understand that it is a VERY rough photoshop 'sketch' since I only had a few minutes in class to toss it together, but it will express my ideas to visual thinkers ok: (URL) Aaron S (21 years ago, 5-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)

6 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR