Subject:
|
Re: Stacking Moonbases
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Fri, 5 Sep 2003 01:59:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
539 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.space, Aaron Sneary wrote:
Whoa! How about having a larger standard internal diameter for vertical
corridors? That would allow a bit more flexibility on how the corridors
transport things vertically. Id hate to have the standard mandate ladders or
antigravity devices. I prefer mechanical lifts.
How about an 8x8 lift tube for people, and a 16x16 lift tube for cargo?
I agree with Jordan about just one vertical tube per module - more seems like
overkill (but I would use additional non-tube stanchions for supporting upper
modules as I think that flat module surfaces touching wouldnt look any good).
The real problem is where the standard place should be. Central would be
neatest, but theres real benefit from placing a lift bay to the side if a
module has a large enclosure.
Im leaning towards saying that the standard specify a vertical module
separation (does it have that already?) and positions for supports, but that
they neednt be tubes - and leave that to modules built specifically for it i.e.
To go to an upper module, a minifig would travel to a nearby lift module, go
upstairs, then horizontally out to the destination module. That way, groups
designing a moonbase can plan ahead to make sure they have an adequate number of
lift modules. Note that a lift module neednt be merely for lifts - it can
still have a cool primary purpose e.g. a multi-level space hotel.
Cheers,
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: Stacking Moonbases
|
| (...) If you're going to get so complex as to build a lift, you might as well be making just a single moonbase that's very tall. Something like this one: (URL) After considering this some more, I'm thinking that having a vertical connection standard (...) (21 years ago, 5-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Stacking Moonbases
|
| (...) Please understand that it is a VERY rough photoshop 'sketch' since I only had a few minutes in class to toss it together, but it will express my ideas to visual thinkers ok: (URL) Aaron S (21 years ago, 5-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|