 | | Re: Stacking Moonbases
|
| (...) I think a drawing would help people visualize this better. Seriously, though, it would be easier for modules to connect if you have a single passageway running up and down in the middle of a baseplate. With four individual columns, you'd be (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Stacking Moonbases
|
| (...) Please understand that it is a VERY rough photoshop 'sketch' since I only had a few minutes in class to toss it together, but it will express my ideas to visual thinkers ok: (URL) Aaron S (21 years ago, 5-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Stacking Moonbases
|
| (...) Whoa! How about having a larger standard internal diameter for vertical corridors? That would allow a bit more flexibility on how the corridors transport things vertically. I'd hate to have the standard mandate ladders or "antigravity (...) (21 years ago, 5-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Stacking Moonbases
|
| (...) If you're going to get so complex as to build a lift, you might as well be making just a single moonbase that's very tall. Something like this one: (URL) After considering this some more, I'm thinking that having a vertical connection standard (...) (21 years ago, 5-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Stacking Moonbases
|
| "Jordan Bradford" <jordan_bradfordREMO...tmail.com> wrote in message news:HKppJr.sy9@lugnet.com... (...) four (...) vertical (...) one (...) I thought I'd add that I'm a big supporter of the single centered column/corrido too. [ j o n ] (URL) (21 years ago, 6-Sep-03, to lugnet.space)
| |
