Subject:
|
Re: Another wallpaper
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Sun, 6 Jul 2003 10:25:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
323 times
|
| |
|
|
"Daniel Jassim" <danieljassim@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:HHKL2G.1uMI@lugnet.com...
> > In lugnet.space, Paul Hartzog wrote:
> > Dan
> > all your wp's are great but if they aren't at least 1600x1200
> > they aren't very useful. it's easy to scale down from that
> > but you can't scale up, alas.
>
> Geez! Do you have your resolution set at 1600 X 1200?! I can't even read
> anything at that resolution. I'm at 1152 X 864 on my PC and 800 X 600 • scales
> pretty good. I know scaling up adds more grain but it gives it a film-like
> quality...at least on my screen. Maybe using Windows XP has something to • do with
> it? Anyway, Id rather not upload files that big since I'm on dial-up AND • 1600 X
> 1200 is just ridiculously too big to work with at this time. Still, tell • me if
> this is any better...
>
> http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/DanJassim/Artwork/wallpaper7a.jpg
>
> Copy it if you dig it or let me know if there's an image you'd like bigger
> because I will delete it in a day or so.
>
> --Dan
Dan. Whadup.
My evil new internet connection is turning me into a night owl.
I run at 1280x960 on a 19" monitor and it looks damn good to me. I don't
see how anyone can run at 1600x1200 on a monitor this size or smaller, but
my monitor chokes (ie: seizure inducing flicker) at that res, so what do I
know.
But I would still say if you're going to make an image as a "Wallpaper" it
should at least be available at 1024x768. Seems like most wallpapers come
in 3 flavors: 1600, 1024 and 800.
I nabbed your 1600 image and dropped it down to 1280 in PS and it looks
good, though a bit blurry. What was the original image size?
Anyway, great pic...whatever the size.
[ j o n ]
--
http://zemi.net
http://the-shipyard.com
http://www.bricklink.com/store.asp?p=jpalmer
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Another wallpaper
|
| (...) Geez! Do you have your resolution set at 1600 X 1200?! I can't even read anything at that resolution. I'm at 1152 X 864 on my PC and 800 X 600 scales pretty good. I know scaling up adds more grain but it gives it a film-like quality...at least (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jul-03, to lugnet.space)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
