Subject:
|
Re: Post-classic space / Pre-Futuron
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Mon, 30 Jun 2003 07:24:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
569 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Paul Baulch wrote:
| |
In lugnet.space, Tim Courtney wrote:
| |
In lugnet.space, Spencer Nowak wrote:
| |
In lugnet.space, Tim Courtney wrote:
| |
Post CS would be Futuron, and after Futuron, M:Tron, etc...
-Tim
|
Oh. I was thinking more along the lines of MOCs in a post clasic space
style, but i guess you have a point. :)
|
What isn’t post-CS about Futuron?
-Tim
|
Hmm, actually I think Tim’s right... to my mind, post-CS would have to be
pre-Futuron if anything. Trouble is, CS was light-gray+blue with trans-yellow
then went to just light-gray with trans-green, then Futuron was white with
trans-blue. Note that trans-green was halfway between the two trans-colors,
and light-gray without blue was closer to white...
|
| |
Cheers,
|
Something I noticed just recently about Futuron is that it was a lot more ‘open’
and less solid than CS. For instance, compare this model:
with this CS set, released the year before Futuron was available:
In fact, this ‘openness’ was a bit of a feature of Futuron, as a LUGNET search
will reveal. Perhaps a Post-CS/ Pre-Futuron creation could have the openness of
Futuron in the colours of CS, or the solidness of late CS in the colours of
Futuron.
God bless,
Matt W.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Post-classic space
|
| (...) Hmm, actually I think Tim's right... to my mind, post-CS would have to be pre-Futuron if anything. Trouble is, CS was light-gray+blue with trans-yellow then went to just light-gray with trans-green, then Futuron was white with trans-blue. Note (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
