Subject:
|
Re: New MOC: The FlyGill
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Fri, 13 Jun 2003 03:50:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
340 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Mark Sandlin wrote:
| |
I like what you have done with the windshields. The side greebles look good.
I don’t think the rear dish serves this particular MOC well. It just looks
kind of tacked-on. The black thingy on the top also doesn’t flow. If you
wanted a fin up there, I’d have used a wing or a slope. Or how about a long
antenna that angles back toward the rear?
I like the landing gear/missile racks. I like the use of binoculars as guns,
but the placement doesn’t make sense to me. It wouldn’t be able to shoot at
anything ahead of the vehicle. I’d say take each stick one of each binocular
gun on each side of the vehicle, up on the “engine” areas. This vehicle seems
to be more of a go-straight-ahead type of thing anyway.
I think you should drop one of the colors. Mladen Pejic once said that three
main colors is enough, and I agree with that. Any more, and it gets kind of
busy and the colors begin to compete.
-Grand Admiral and Keeper of Fleebnorks
|
I’m agree with Mark here. The windshield is cool, and the greeblies work well.
The radar, it seems to me, would work better if it was bigger and had more meat
to it.
Keep it up!
-Bruce
LEGO @ Bruce’s Homepage
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New MOC: The FlyGill
|
| (...) I like what you have done with the windshields. The side greebles look good. I don't think the rear dish serves this particular MOC well. It just looks kind of tacked-on. The black thingy on the top also doesn't flow. If you wanted a fin up (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
