 | | Dragonfly remixed
|
| Okay, I admit it! My previous model, the (URL) Dragonfly> was a structurally inept disaster, but no more! I went back to the drawing board and decided to scrap the design for a more refined 'straightforward' look. I believe it came out reasonably (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Dragonfly remixed
|
| (...) Well that certainly looks like it can survive a good whooshing now. Very cool. -Mike Petrucelli (URL) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Dragonfly remixed
|
| "Matt Hein" <Pyrokid17@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:HGCoLs.2Lt@lugnet.com... (...) You're gonna kill me, but I have to go with the earlier version... ;) The delicate one had more personality. Snot design sure is a pain in the butt, ain't it? (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.space)
| | | | | Re: Dragonfly remixed
|
| (...) Ooh, better and better. I like the mini-airplane looks of this. I like what you did with the wings. What I don't like are the engines- the idea is good but they look a bit random. Try making an identical 3 parts for it. Also, I think it'll (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Dragonfly remixed
|
| (...) In terms of personality, perhaps you're a bit right. However, the design was awfully fragile and I was aiming for a solid feel with this ship. Actually, incorporating technic elements into the design sounds like a viable suggestion, Tom...I'll (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Dragonfly remixed
|
| (...) Noted. (...) I see...yes, that area is definitely open to improvement, so I'll take your suggestion to mind. Maybe the idea here is to have the engine 'flow' with the model, so it appears more congruous? I believe the purchase of many more (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| |
