Subject:
|
Re: Admirals? We don't need no steenking admirals.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Wed, 11 Jun 2003 20:34:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
437 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Lindsay Frederick Braun wrote:
(snip)
| |
--all the way up to “Keeper of
Fleebnorks.” (What? You don’t think that’s a powerful
title? Oh, but it is--where do you think those
fleebnorks all come from? Can you imagine the kind
of power necessary to keep them in line while they’re
waiting to be unleashed? Yeah, I knew you’d agree.)
|
If I may be so bold, I would claim that title for myself. :D
-Grand Admiral and Keeper of Fleebnorks
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Admirals? We don't need no steenking admirals.
|
| (...) I noticed you had. Seeing as how you're the only person we're aware of currently packaging and selling said norks of fleeb, you've got the strongest claim to it anyways. (Incidentally, I wonder if being "Keeper of Fleebnorks" means that your (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jun-03, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Admirals? We don't need no steenking admirals.
|
| (...) Now, see, that's a start. A forum full of plain- vanilla admirals? What fun is that? They'd never argue or compete, they'd just compare rubber duckies and have waterfights. Generals are good, but we can surely be even more creative than that. (...) (21 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.space)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
