 | | Re: New Fad?
|
| (...) Ok. I have to strongly disagree here. In my legoverse landing gear is an easily exploitable weakness on military ships. Landing gear on my military ships (any size that can land) is always built directly into the hull of the ship to eliminate (...) (22 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.space)
| | | | | Re: New Fad?
|
| (...) Perhaps the requirement be that the ship is "functional" so to speak: i.e., there is crew access, and it won't tip to one side or the other when landed. Jeff Benson jbenso1@towson.edu (22 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.space)
| | | | | Re: New Fad?
|
| (...) Whoa! My bad. I didn't mean to imply that fixed landing gear was unacceptable, it's totally fine by me. What I meant was that I viewed the presence of landing gear of some kind as mandatory. I've made fighters without landing gear at all, it's (...) (22 years ago, 9-Apr-03, to lugnet.space)
| | | | | Re: New Fad?
|
| (...) easily (...) (any (...) Um... Perhaps my reply came across a little more argumentative than I intended. (...) I see, that makes much more sense than my original assumption. (...) -Mike Petrucelli (22 years ago, 9-Apr-03, to lugnet.space)
| |
