 | | Re: Ex-lurker + Advertisement
|
|
(...) Hey Andrew! Just wanted to welcome you in from delurking! (Although between the Spraw adventure and planning the full Starship RPG, messages from you seem all too familiar to me to think of you as a lurker.) :-] Keep up the good work! -Hendo (23 years ago, 21-Jan-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.gaming)
|
| |
| | Re: Some great Space info and dicussion
|
|
(...) Holy Moly! You sure know your physics! :) I would add though, that if the attacker in this scenario were concerned with "expenditure of resources" then they would be very unwise to ever consider killing a planet known to harbor life. Let's for (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Some great Space info and dicussion
|
|
(...) *When great distances are involved*, Yes, and this is precisely why there would be a place for carrier ships in SF space warfare. Although who ever said anything about cubical fuel tanks? Liquid and solid fuels are quite low-tech for some (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: A few new bots... and a bit more
|
|
(...) I'm not sure what's happening here, but it looks like serious sh**, especially the last shot. Surely Chewie's not gonna be killed off AGAIN!? ;^) (...) Ooo. That's a lot o' style in a little ship, from the sculpted nose, to the splayed (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Some great Space info and dicussion
|
|
Hi Jordan, If I may respond to a few of your comments... (...) I believe this to be true in modern day fleets. I am sure fuel and energy usage are calculated into a mission. (...) If you take a look at the history of technology, it is filled with (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
