To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 2035
2034  |  2036
Subject: 
Re: Unnamed Fighter
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space
Date: 
Sat, 29 Apr 2000 00:05:31 GMT
Viewed: 
581 times
  
     Don't you love it when people complement about stuff on your models that
you didnt rlize you included/Didn't mean to include? And a pointer- Instead of
saying "Oh, never thought of it like that", say "Yes, It took awhile to
include that feature- I think It makes the ship look more prodominent!" Other
adjectives that no on eknows the name of/how to spell also work.

...j/k... =)

Pearson



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Unnamed Fighter
 
It's a perfectly promulent word. ~Mark (...) models that (...) Instead of (...) Other (...) (25 years ago, 29-Apr-00, to lugnet.space)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Unnamed Fighter
 
(...) features (...) Thanks Duane. Yep, that's it. I also thought it looked a bit like an athletic shoe. (...) Ooo yeah.. I never thought of it like that, but yeah.. :) Why put in cargo space when you can beef up the engines? -Tom McD. when (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.space)

14 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR