 | | Re: More previews from BCS —Joel Kuester
|
| | | (...) Thanks! The different sections of the ship are very sturdy. I have had no problems with cave-ins or anything (without the removable floors insalled, the ship is essentially hollow) but there is no way I could lift it all as one peice. I have (...) (25 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: More previews from BCS —Paul Davidson
|
| | | | -- Paul Davidson, aka Tinman www.theforce.net | Your Daily Dose of Star Wars www.filmforce.net | Your Daily Dose of Film News (...) problems (...) is (...) least (...) in 3 (...) My own current capital ship (the "Nautilus", (...) (25 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: More previews from BCS —Joel Kuester
|
| | | | (...) actually, the main reason I had to make it modular is because of the center "neck" section. With two huge bulky ends attached to it, I'm sure it would break if I tried to lift it. This is the reason my next ship will be more solid. The (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: More previews from BCS —Paul Davidson
|
| | | | (...) it (...) be (...) ship (...) to (...) a (...) to (...) etc... (...) much (...) Cool, can't wait. (...) was (...) for (...) That'll happen when I find out a good way to get pictures of it onto my computer...I'm too lazy to find a normal (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
