Subject:
|
Re: The Lowdown on 2003 @ WAL* MART
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:26:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
40 times
|
| |
|
|
I don't think they can really call it a leak, I just bought Jabba's Palace
this weekend at Wal*Mart.
At 11:52 PM 12/14/02 +0000, Tony Knaak wrote:
> OOOOOOOOOOH! Oh man! That's not good. I hope I don't get in trouble.
>
>
> In lugnet.starwars, Erik Olson writes:
> >
> > Tony, it's a bad idea to leak this stuff. Sure it may be old news . But your
> > computer at work is not a public information system. You don't want to be
> > made into an example for treating it like one.
> >
> > See
> > http://news.lugnet.com/general/?n=20851
> > http://news.lugnet.com/general/?n=20866
> > for what happened with Target in 2001.
> >
> > In lugnet.starwars, Tony Knaak writes:
> > > When at work today (WAL* MART) I scanned through all the LEGO • merchandise on
> > > our inventory computer.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: The Lowdown on 2003 @ WAL* MART
|
| (...) It wasn't the giving out the information of the availability of certain sets that was the problem, but the sharing of information on certain quantities. The public DOES NOT have right to know how many sets a certain retailer has, whether it is (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: The Lowdown on 2003 @ WAL* MART
|
| Tony, it's a bad idea to leak this stuff. Sure it may be old news . But your computer at work is not a public information system. You don't want to be made into an example for treating it like one. See (URL) what happened with Target in 2001. (...) (22 years ago, 14-Dec-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
