 | | Re: Easy starfield, planet and star recipe
|
| In lugnet.space, Daniel Jassim writes: ... (...) . . . (...) looks wrong. The lit spot is too small, unless the star is tiny, and practically on top of the planet. Perhaps you need to drag the gradient circle just a bit further if you start at the (...) (22 years ago, 19-Sep-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish.photography)
| | | | | Re: Easy starfield, planet and star recipe
|
| (...) Thank you for your suggestions. I was trying to keep this recipe as basic as possible--sort of an intro for those who haven't tried this. Thus, that particular picture was not an exercise in astronomical accuracy but more for simply using the (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish.photography)
| | | | | Re: Easy starfield, planet and star recipe
|
| Actually Dan, I've been taking the Jassim Starfield (and Galaxy) tutorial and have been more than pleased with the resulting galactic backdrops. It's saved me scouring the 'Net and stealing other people's images. Thanks kindly, Teach! Cheers, -G (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish.photography)
| | | | | Re: Easy starfield, planet and star recipe
|
| (...) Actually my "more accurate rendering" was done with pencil and paper. I suppose I could scan it. As for astronomical accuracy, I just thought somewhere in the back of my mind that the lit spot on the planet was somehow different from the way (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish.photography)
| | | | | Re: Easy starfield, planet and star recipe
|
| (...) Thanks, Gil! It's my pleasure to share this with everyone and help get the creative juices flowing and gather input to improve my techniques. I'll try to keep the info coming. I know I'd like to go over how to make a canyonesque planet but I (...) (22 years ago, 21-Sep-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish.photography)
| |
