Subject:
|
Re: New acronym proposal for giant lego spaceships
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Wed, 4 Sep 2002 05:45:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2965 times
|
| |
|
|
> > The point is, to be quite truthful, even looking at typical normal every • day
> > vehicles on planet Earth is a headache to keep up and then there are • phased
> > out models and the debate to keep models alive for one more year and to
> > slightly alter them every year.
>
> Maybe, if you're keeping track of models! But it's not the case if you're
> merely tracking sizes/types - subcompact, compact, mid-sized, full-sized,
> luxury, and trucks designated by tonnage.
>
> Cheers
>
> Richie Dulin
This is sort of what I was trying to get at. I think that there could be
hyperlogical systemic ways to derive names for the vehicle classes, but i
also do like the idea of coining a new word altogether or using an ancronym,
possibly one that is not rooted in a word from a common tounge. I think
that ship names and variant classifications, should be left to the
individual manufacturers to determine for whatever thier personal reason.
-tk
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New acronym proposal for giant lego spaceships
|
| (...) ...and who are familiar with the model designations of North American Trucks... (...) ... of all those, the only ones we've had here in Australia are the Suburban (rebadged as a Holden Suburban) and the Neon (if it's the same thing - a compact (...) (22 years ago, 4-Sep-02, to lugnet.space)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
