Subject:
|
Re: New acronym proposal for giant lego spaceships
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Tue, 3 Sep 2002 14:11:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2616 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Gil Shaw writes:
>
> 100 stud = SEE1 or C1
> 200 stud = SEE2 or C2
> 300 stud = SEE3 or C3
> 400 stud = SEEDEE4 or CD4
> 500 stud = DEE5 or D5
My this is very appealing to my compartmentalized dorkness. It's a simple
classification, but unfortunately based upon size, which I dislike. I would
rather see something based upon function. With the classification based upon
size, a couple of extraneous antennae could be all that is necessary to bump
a ship to the next catagory.
>
> Too boring?
Not at all....
-Duane
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New acronym proposal for giant lego spaceships
|
| too boring what? this is great. I think that its so logical that it can't help but appeal to my sense of organization and function. I really like this idea. maybe we could just say that there is a C1 which is 100-299 and a C3 which is 300 or longer. (...) (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New acronym proposal for giant lego spaceships
|
| This sounds good IMHO. Incorporating the stud count into the name somehow seems to be a good venue to explore. I suppose the other advantage is that it might be a little more self-explanatory to new folks....I only found out what BURPS were a couple (...) (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.space)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
