To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 16956
16955  |  16957
Subject: 
Re: More moonbase and Monorail discussion
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space
Date: 
Mon, 2 Sep 2002 00:16:40 GMT
Viewed: 
614 times
  
"Mike Petrucelli" <lordi@erols.com> wrote in message
news:H1s92p.2y2@lugnet.com...
(Also I don't have a monorail of my own so could someone please tell me • what
a good interior height for my terminal should be, to allow plenty of
clearance?)

For plenty of clearance, at least 8 high.

-Jon

Actually, I'd say that at least 8, maybe 10 high, and about 8 wide.  The
whole teminal would need to take up two 48x48 plates, since my 6990 train
covers 54 lugs in all.

How will we make sure that the tracks line up on each module?  The curves
are 32x32, and will not match up like the modules do.

--
Markham Carroll



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: More moonbase and Monorail discussion
 
"Markham Carroll" <mc_booga@hotpop.com> wrote in message news:H1sBwE.881@lugnet.com... (...) I'm not so concerned with building a structure that can contain an entire train. My main goal with this is to have a tunnel properly aligned on my module so (...) (22 years ago, 2-Sep-02, to lugnet.space)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: More moonbase and Monorail discussion
 
(...) Well 20 high would make more sense as it would not conflict with the corridors. (...) For plenty of clearance, at least 8 high. (...) (22 years ago, 1-Sep-02, to lugnet.space)

9 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR