Subject:
|
Re: Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Sun, 18 Aug 2002 21:09:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
405 times
|
| |
|
|
Actually, this seems like a pretty good idea to me; I'd been
struggling with the idea of an in-door mass-transit system &
this could solve one of the problems quite eligantly - the use
of 'shims' so that you can mate it with either standard or
'fat' corridors is excellent. Not sure it needs to become part
of the formal standard; I'd say use it for your own modules,
and bring along enough 'slim-shims' to make sure you don't
have any problems mating up with others - & bring along
some spare 'wide-shims', just in case anyone else (e.g. me)
has adopted the idea too ! Doesn't damage the current
standard, but adds another twist to the whole marvelous
madness we call 'moonbase' !
In lugnet.space, Markham Carroll writes:
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=23517
>
> I have designed a corridor that allows space for more minifigs to fit
> through, and some corridor converters. The doubled width of the corridor
> would work well in the high-traffic areas of the moonbase, and are still
> easy to convert to the narrow pathway. Is this design acceptible for the
> standards?
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors?
|
| (URL) have designed a corridor that allows space for more minifigs to fit through, and some corridor converters. The doubled width of the corridor would work well in the high-traffic areas of the moonbase, and are still easy to convert to the narrow (...) (22 years ago, 16-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
