Subject:
|
Re: Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Sun, 18 Aug 2002 23:56:46 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
491 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Markham Carroll writes:
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=23517
>
> I have designed a corridor that allows space for more minifigs to fit
> through, and some corridor converters. The doubled width of the corridor
> would work well in the high-traffic areas of the moonbase, and are still
> easy to convert to the narrow pathway. Is this design acceptible for the
> standards?
>
> BTW, anyone want me to design a Moonbase logo? I am pretty good at drawing.
>
> --
> Markham Carroll
This can only work if all wide corridors are set 2 studs back to allow room
for the adapter to the standard width without affecting normal design. This
would also mean you need a four stud deep connector to attach two wider
corridors together.
Jude
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors?
|
| (...) Not necessarily. You can make a modular connector sleeve which disconnects from the corridor itself with 1x1 technic bricks. So, switching out a standard connector with an adapter would be easy. Similar to the modular corridor idea on the (...) (22 years ago, 19-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors?
|
| (URL) have designed a corridor that allows space for more minifigs to fit through, and some corridor converters. The doubled width of the corridor would work well in the high-traffic areas of the moonbase, and are still easy to convert to the narrow (...) (22 years ago, 16-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
